Class 11 Micro Economics Notes · CBSE
Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic Competition — understanding a market of many firms selling closely related but differentiated products. CBSE Class 11 Microeconomics notes with graphs.
Last updated: 15 Sep 2026
Notes
Meaning and Example
Markets of products like soap, toothpaste, AC, etc. are examples of monopolistic competition.
Features of Monopolistic Competition
There are a large number of firms selling closely related, but not homogeneous products. Each firm acts independently and has a limited share of the market. So, an individual firm has limited control over the market price. A large number of firms leads to competition in the market.
Each firm is in a position to exercise some degree of monopoly (in spite of a large number of sellers) through product differentiation. Product differentiation refers to differentiating the products on the basis of brand, size, colour, shape, etc. The product of a firm is a close, but not a perfect, substitute for another firm. The implication of 'Product differentiation' is that buyers of a product differentiate between the same product produced by different firms. Therefore, they are also willing to pay different prices for the same product produced by different firms. This gives some monopoly power to an individual firm to influence the market price of its product.
Under monopolistic competition, products are differentiated and these differences are made known to the buyers through selling costs. Selling costs refer to the expenses incurred on marketing, sales promotion and advertisement of the product. Such costs are incurred to persuade the buyers to buy a particular brand of the product in preference to a competitor's brand. Due to this reason, selling costs constitute a substantial part of the total cost under monopolistic competition. It must be noted that there are no selling costs in perfect competition because products are homogeneous in nature and there is perfect knowledge amongst buyers and sellers. Similarly, under monopoly, selling costs are of a small amount (only for informative purposes) as the firm does not face competition from any other firm.
Under monopolistic competition, firms are free to enter into or exit from the industry at any time they wish. Free entry and exit of firms means that there are no barriers before the firm for entering into the industry and leaving the industry. New firms can enter when they find that the existing firms are earning abnormal profits. With their entry, the output of the industry increases, which leads to a fall in the price of the product. This continues till each firm is earning only normal profit. The existing firms leave when they face losses. As they leave, the output of the industry goes down, raising the price of the product till the losses are wiped out. It ensures that there are neither abnormal profits nor any abnormal losses to a firm in the long run. However, it must be noted that entry under monopolistic competition is not as easy and free as under perfect competition.
Buyers and sellers do not have perfect knowledge about the market conditions. Selling costs create artificial superiority in the minds of the consumers and it becomes very difficult for a consumer to evaluate different products available in the market. As a result, a particular product (although highly priced) is preferred by the consumers even if other less priced products are of the same quality.
A firm under monopolistic competition is neither a price-taker nor a price-maker. However, by producing a unique product or establishing a particular reputation, each firm has partial control over the price. The extent of power to control price depends upon how strongly the buyers are attached to his brand.
In addition to price competition, non-price competition also exists under monopolistic competition. Non-Price Competition refers to competing with other firms by offering free gifts, making favourable credit terms, etc., without changing prices of their own products. Firms under monopolistic competition compete in a number of ways to attract customers. They use both Price Competition (competing with other firms by reducing the price of the product) and Non-Price Competition to promote their sales.
Explore Product Differentiation
The product of each individual firm is identified and distinguished from the products of other firms due to product differentiation.
To differentiate the products, firms sell their products with different brand names, like Lux, Dove, Lifebuoy, etc.
The differentiation among different competing products may be based on either 'real' or 'imaginary' differences.
Product differentiation creates a monopoly position for a firm.
A higher degree of product differentiation (i.e. better brand image) makes the demand for the product less elastic and enables the firm to charge a price higher than its competitor's products. For example, Pepsodent is costlier than Babool.
Real Differences
Real Differences may be due to differences in shape, flavour, colour, packing, after-sale service, warranty period, etc.
shape · flavour · colour · packing · after-sale service · warranty periodImaginary Differences
Imaginary Differences mean differences which are not really obvious but buyers are made to believe that such differences exist through selling costs (advertising).
advertising-created beliefsPepsodent
Colgate
Neem
Babool
Demand Curve under Monopolistic Competition and MR < AR
Under monopolistic competition, a large number of firms selling closely related but differentiated products makes the demand curve downward sloping. It implies that a firm can sell more output only by reducing the price of its product.
As seen in Fig 10.4, output is measured along the X-axis and price & revenue along the Y-axis. At OP price, a seller can sell OQ quantity. Demand rises to OQ₁, when the price is reduced to OP₁. So, the demand curve under monopolistic competition is negatively sloped as more quantity can be sold only at a lower price.
Like monopoly, MR is also less than AR under monopolistic competition due to the negatively sloped demand curve.
Fig 10.4 — Demand Curve of a Firm under Monopolistic Competition
Under Monopolistic Competition
Long-run Equilibrium under Monopolistic Competition
A firm, under monopolistic competition, earns normal profits in the long run due to freedom of entry and exit.
The firm's demand curve (AR curve) slopes downwards as more output can be sold only by reducing the price. Due to this reason, the MR curve is also negatively sloped (see Fig 10.6).
In the figure, LAC and LMC are, respectively, the long-run average cost and long-run marginal cost curves.
The conditions for equilibrium — 'MR is equal to LMC' and 'LMC curve cuts the MR curve from below' — are satisfied at point E.
Point E is the equilibrium position of the firm at which the equilibrium output is OQ at the price of OP. Corresponding to this, LAC = AR. So, the firm will be earning only normal profits.
Fig 10.6 — Long-run Equilibrium under Monopolistic Competition
Key Takeaways
Key Takeaways
- Monopolistic competition = monopoly + competition: many firms, each a monopolist over its own brand, facing stiff competition from close substitutes. ⭐
- Seven features: large number of sellers, product differentiation, selling costs, freedom of entry and exit, lack of perfect knowledge, partial price control, non-price competition. ⭐
- Product differentiation may be real (shape, flavour, colour, packing, after-sale service, warranty) or imaginary (created through selling costs/advertising). ⭐
- A higher degree of product differentiation makes demand less elastic — e.g. Pepsodent is costlier than Babool.
- Selling costs: none in perfect competition, substantial in monopolistic competition, only informative (small) in monopoly. ⭐
- The demand curve is downward sloping and more elastic than under monopoly (close substitutes exist); MR < AR. ⭐
- Freedom of entry and exit ensures only normal profits in the long run — though entry is not as free as under perfect competition. ⭐