Class 11 Micro Economics Notes · CBSE

Revenue Curves under Imperfect Competition

Revenue Curves under Imperfect Competition — understanding downward-sloping AR and MR curves and the monopoly versus monopolistic competition difference. CBSE Class 11 Microeconomics notes with graphs and practice problems.

Last updated: 12 Sep 2026

Notes

When Price Falls with Rise in Output

When Price Falls with rise in output (Imperfect Competition)
In this situation, a firm follows its own pricing policy. However, it can increase sales only by reducing the price.
When firms can increase sales only by decreasing the price, then AR falls with an increase in sale. Revenue from every additional unit (MR) will be less than AR.

AR and MR Curves Slope Downwards

Both AR and MR curves slope downwards. MR falls faster than AR — the MR curve is steeper.

MR is limited to one unit, whereas AR is derived by all the units. This leads to a lesser fall in AR than in MR.

The MR curve can be zero and negative, while AR remains positive.

MR can fall to zero and can even become negative. However, AR can be neither zero nor negative as TR is always positive.
-4-20246AR and MR (in ₹)0123456Units SoldMR = 0
Units soldAR (₹)TR (₹)MR (₹)
1555
2483
3391
42.2590
515−4

Monopoly vs Monopolistic Competition

AspectMonopolyMonopolistic Competition
Close substitutesAbsentPresent
Elasticity of AR and MR curvesLess elastic — steeper curvesMore elastic — flatter curves
Effect of a price increase on demandProportionately smaller fall in demandProportionately larger fall in demand

Monopoly — Steep curves

01234567AR and MR (in ₹)0123456Units Sold

Monopolistic Competition — Flatter curves

01234567AR and MR (in ₹)0123456Units Sold

Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways

  • Under imperfect competition, AR and MR curves slope downwards — more output can only be sold at a lower price.
  • MR falls faster than AR — the MR curve is steeper.
  • MR can become zero or negative while AR remains positive.
  • Under monopolistic competition, AR and MR are more elastic (flatter) than under monopoly due to close substitutes.