Class 12 Business Administration Notes · GSEB
Decentralization
Decentralization — the orderly delegation of decision power from upper to lower levels. GSEB Class 12 Commerce notes covering centralisation versus decentralisation, Fayol's definition, six benefits, and the situations where it should be avoided.
Last updated: 27 Oct 2026
Notes
Centralised or Decentralised?
Notes — the key lines
Centralisation keeps authority at the top; decentralisation disperses it. The choice follows the size of the unit and the need for speed. Decentralisation is favourable when decisions must be quick and local.
Centralised
- Some units centralise authority at the top level, and most decisions are taken there. In others, decision making is done at all levels and certain decisions are taken as per the requirement of the work.
- All power resting on the upper level is a centralised structure; all powers distributed with every level holding specific powers is decentralisation of authority.
- The thought of decentralisation is important from the viewpoint of authority and responsibility. Administrators must decide whether power will be centralised or decentralised; small organisations can stay centralised and large ones can decentralise.
Trap — Decentralisation is not the absence of control — control moves down with the authority.
Meaning and Definition
Notes — the key lines
Decentralisation disperses decision-making authority to middle and lower levels. It is centralisation’s opposite, chosen as per the size and needs of the unit. It is not the same as delegation: it is a unit-wide policy, not a one-to-one act.
To assign powers to the superiors, to enable distribution of work, and to include in decision making process is called decentralization.
- The delegation of power from the upper to the lower level in an orderly manner is known as decentralisation of power.
- The allotment of decision-making authority to that sphere of people who need to take decisions is decentralisation of power.
- It does not mean that all powers are given by the upper-level administrators to the lower level — most of the powers are given, and that is decentralisation of power.
Trap — Delegation happens between two people; decentralisation is an organisation-wide choice.
Importance of Decentralisation
Notes — the key lines
Six gains: quick decisions, less top load, motivation, management ability, effective control, harmony. It builds future managers from inside the unit. It keeps authority close to the point of action.
The success of management depends on the proper distribution of authority and responsibilities. Centralisation brings hierarchy, non-scientifically taken decisions, non-cooperation, lack of specialisation and more workload, so the idea of decentralisation has become popular. In modern business units, decentralisation of power is seen in the majority of cases.
The person who has to take the decision in a work or activity is completely involved and holds the power to decide, so decisions are taken quickly and effectively.
The top level takes most policy decisions. Decentralisation gives decision-taking authority to the middle or lower level, so the workload on the upper level is reduced.
Employees gain motivation and self-confidence. They are given independence at the middle or lower levels, and seeing their decisions succeed boosts confidence and teaches them how to decide in such situations.
Middle and lower employees decide as per their powers and are given independence, so they become efficient leaders, develop coordinated working, able administrative skills and control. Decisions in different circumstances increase their abilities — the future managers emerge.
Managers at all levels have enough power to exercise control where employees commit mistakes and to take disciplinary action, so effective control is maintained.
All levels are included in decision making and given due importance. Decision makers and followers discuss matters and take proper decisions, one group comes in contact with another, and an environment of harmony is created.
Trap — “Effective control” is a gain of decentralisation, not of centralisation — the control travels with the authority.
Limitations
Notes — the key lines
Decentralisation is not always possible: small units and secret-sensitive businesses cannot use it. Common policy and co-ordination become harder as authority spreads. It costs more and can produce inconsistent decisions.
- Where the organisation runs on a very small scale and business secrets must be maintained with great vigilance, decentralisation cannot be accepted.
- Sometimes decentralisation is not successful because a common policy is not implemented or co-ordination is not maintained properly.
Trap — “When is decentralisation possible?” needs the negative conditions too, not only the eight gains.
Key Takeaways
- Decentralisation is unsuitable for a very small organisation.
- It is unsuitable where business secrets need close central vigilance.
- It fails when a common policy cannot be implemented.
- It fails when co-ordination cannot be maintained.
- Large size and diverse operations are the natural home of decentralisation.
Exam Questions
Exam Questions
Attempt first; then open the answer.